Promoting the N.U.G.U.N. Blog

I have wanted to have a means to promote my blog when I encounter people would have an interest in it. I thought of business cards, stickers, etc. But then a co-worker showed up with these really cool “MiniCards” from Moo.com. These are small, high quality business cards.

http://www.moo.com/products/minicards.php

These MiniCards are about 1″ high and just under 3″ wide. They’re multi color and high quality with a nice coating. It’s a $19.95 for 100 MiniCards. But here’s the cool thing, each one of your MiniCards can have a different front image. (So if you had a very large gun collection you could have a different one on each card.) Delivery took just over a week to deliver. (Looks like they were shipped from Germany, FYI.)

They also sell a specialized Moo MiniCard holder for a few dollars more. Great for keeping some cards in your range bag.

To all my fellow bloggers, I highly recommend these MiniCards. If you ARE interested. Please let me know, because I have a few coupon codes for 15% & 20% off. Available on a first come, first serve basis.

- N.U.G.U.N.

Published in: on October 31, 2008 at 9:06 pm Comments (1)
Tags: , ,

Competitive Shooting: Day 1

Today was to be the monumental day of my very first competitive shooting experience.

On Thursday night I left work early. Drove from Lancaster, PA down to Glen Rock, PA. I arrived at Freedom Armory at 6:30pm. I decided to pay the league fee as well as the entry fee for the given competition. So the total cost was $45 ($25 league/$20 event). The way the league works is thus; there will be six shoots. And your four highest scores will count as your league rank.

After paying it was off to the waiting area. I got a bit of an idea what to expect from chatting with the other participants and those running the event.

First off, the question must be asked… “Why compete?”

Competition is a good way to simulate a higher stress environment for testing and training one’s accuracy, action patterns, and safe handling. As well as evaluating one’s equipment and the arrangement of that equipment.

Going into this, my main purpose has been to learn. In particular, learn those areas which I need to study and train. I have never done anything like this in my life; it is a completely new experience for me. I have a decent firearm and four magazines but I am woefully lacking when it comes to additional equipment. I have a holster, but it’s a cheap $20 “Uncle Mike” clone with a slot for one extra mag.

So it was off to the competition. And truth be told, I had a pretty rocky start. My initial difficulty was in the basic concepts of readiness. I assumed “standby” meant wait at ready. I then found myself having not loaded up. The second mistake I made in the first course was I drew when the target started to move downrange instead of waiting for it to turn. Ooopss!!!!

The first course of fire required 12 rounds. I was shooting a Ruger P-345 which is a single stack .45 ACP (8+1). I was also informed that we would be shooting what people were referring to as “Virginia Rules”. You would be penalized points for any extra shots fired. I had four magazines but I only brought two onto the range with me having decided to load my first magazine to full capacity and my second magazine to 1/2 capacity (4 rounds) for a total of 12 rounds. My thought being that such would prevent me from shooting too many rounds.

I had decided to claim a DQ on myself due to this first course of fire. I figured I had 5 more shoots and only needed my best four to count. Alas, such would not be the case. The machinery on my firing lane went on the fritz on the next couple courses. The result, I was going to have to reshoot in the next group. Truthfully, this worked out very well for me. When I went in the second time, I now had a much better understanding of how the competitive system worked. Commands. What actions I was supposed to do when. Now, as soon as a course of fire was over, I was reloading and placing my firearm in the holster ready for the next course of action.

Approximately 1/2 hour later, it was all over. And I was getting my target scored. I shot a lot better than I actually expected. Scored a 196 out of 240. I had 41 out of 48 possible shots on target. If I recall correctly, I had 9X’s (or center/bullseye hits). While not likely to be competitive for the top positions, which was not my goal, it does provide me with a decent standard upon which to compete against myself . What was important is what I have learned from the experience:

  • First, I gained some knowledge of the competitive sport of shooting. While not directly related to my self-defense. The knowledge of such actions will facilitate my continued participation in competition.
     
  • My holster is exactly what it is, a $20 holster. It has a few quirks that are less than optimum for competition. Namely, there is a slight lip in the front that prevents pulling the sidearm straight out. Instead I need to pull it backwards ever so slightly before raising the sidearm free. Normally when I carry, I use the holster as a cross-carry in which this issue does not present itself as a problem. But I understand that cross draw is not popular at ranges due to the fact that a cross draw can easily sweep other people – turning them into targets. Not so good…
     
  • The holster I was using features a slot for an extra magazine. A small flap latches shut via velcro. Using this holster in competition showed the advantage of having a stand-a-lone mag pouch on the opposite hip. Reloading my pistol requires me to reach across my waiste, unhitch the flap and remove the fresh magazine. I am pretty sure it’d be easier to just have one on the left side, grab it and pop it in.
     
  • A third issue with my holster is the it features a thumb-break strap. The strap cross over the back of the gun securing it to the holster. It has a button snap which must be released before one can draw the sidearm. This is not insurmountable, but…it does require particular attention to training and familiarity. One of my missed shots was due to this strap. I had failed to run my finger across it in a way to release. When I went to pull my sidearm out…it was trapped. Now I consider this very much a training issue. I had far less problems with this once I made a mental note that I had to run my thumb along the strap in a low sweeping motion – freeing the sidearm. But this just shows my point, competition is a superb real-life trainer.
     
  • .45 ACP, this is a big round. My Ruger P-345 seems to handle it very nicely. The single stack grip makes the sidearm comfortable in my hands (unlike the double-stack Glocks in .45). That said, while I do have better capacity than most revolvers, I have significantly less “firepower” (ammo capacity) than those shooting .40S&W and 9mm. This is NOT so much a bad thing, as simply something to be aware of. If I am going to carry a single stack in .45. Then I need to put extra training in reloading and be sure to keep an extra magazine handy.
     
  • Ready Status: What ready-status should my firearm be? Magazine loaded? Round chambered or not? Safety on or not? These are questions that were clearly posed to me by the competition. Truthfully, I am not sure of “my” answers yet.I made a fair number of mistakes such as failing to chamber a round before pulling the trigger. I do believe that it is acceptable for some to choose NOT to leave one in the chamber. But doing so with a pistol means that your training must focus on immediately racking as you draw. It must also bring with it the knowledge that you have just given your opponent x.xxx seconds of extra time to put one into you before you put one into him.
     
  • Safety versus De-cocker: My particular sidearm has a safety/decocker. For those new to guns. A decocker releases, or decocks, the hammer of the gun. Either returning the firearm a to double-action state OR to a non-fire state, and in the case of my pistol which features a safety/decocker. It returns it to a non-fire state with safety on safe.FYI, I really like the de-cocker feature.  I am also comforted by the knowledge of the safety. It’s potentially an extra layer between an accident IMHO. That said, drawing your sidearm, pulling the trigger and “nada” because the safety’s on; can be a matter of life or death. I am of the opinion that this is both a training issue and an equipment issue. Training will reveal to you whether your chosen method is satisfactory with a given piece of equipment or whether the equipment requires modification, or even whether new equipment is necessary. In fact, after the first course of fire I decided to try using the safety as a de-cocker for the remaining courses.
     
  • The mind: this is where much of the battle is fought. The blood coursing, the heart pounding, the nerves on edge. The brain doing it’s best to evaluate everything and take it all in, and in the end make the right decision that could decide life or death, or even more importantly – whose death. This it the muscle that requires training, so that the singles to all your other muscles become inherently natural. It’s also the tool that must evaluate how you are training to ensure whether you are meeting your goals. And the equally important aspect of knowing one’s capabilities. For all those 30 yrs olds like me who grew up watching G.I. Joe and remember the slogan “Knowing is half the battle!” - this is it!
     

***

After the competition, and the scoring of my target I chatted with to Chuck, who was running the event. Chuck also happens to be the instructor that I took the NRA courses with. He commented on a number of areas of struggle he saw. No condemnation, just encouragement, guidance and sharing of his wisdom. In particular the aspect of the safety/decocker. But he also made a comment on comfortability, and recognizing that I’m not fully comfortable with all these aspects as of yet – and that it was okay.

When he said this, I think he truly hit the bullet on the primer. As all of this is VERY new to me. I’ve been a gun owner for about 1 and 1/2 years now. I’ve had a carry permit for 6 months. And there is a certain acceptance that one must make at each level of readiness. Some will say you should this, you should that. I am of the opinion that you SHOULDN’T do anything that you’re not comfortable and prepared to do – that’s how accidents happen.

The first night after I got my carry permit and my carry sidearm. I was not yet comfortable to carry. But I really wanted too ever so much! But I was a lone. I had no formal training, I had no “Gunny” friend to show me the ropes, to ride along with…I had to work out my “defense” with “fear and trembling”. So I rode around all evening with my wife carrying an unloaded pistol. (I did keep loaded magazines in vehicle.) Part of me kept thinking, watch…of all nights you’ll get robbed – it’ll be the one night you’re carrying an empty weapon. Thank the Lord, that was not to be the case. Some would say what I did was stupid. But really, was I in any more jeopardy that I had been the rest of my unarmed life? No… and it wasn’t long until I had a magazine loaded in the grip – the very next day. All that said, I am just coming around to being comfortable with the idea of leaving a round in the chamber. We grow in stages and we grow as our experience grows.

What I am very much aware of, and what this recent competition re-affirmed; is that regardless of what I decide, I must train accordingly. And accept the risks and benefits of any given decision.

- N.U.G.U.N.

PS – I also passed out a number of my new mini-cards for the N.U.G.U.N. blog. If you got one, chime in and let me know you’re reading.


For those interested to know what our course of fire was for the evening. I have gotten permission to re-post it here. So the following is the course of fire we shot last night.

48 Round “WARM-UP” PPC MATCH

STAGE #1
7 YARDS, 12 ROUNDS, 20 SECONDS
FREESTYLE

STAGE #2
15 YARDS, 12 ROUNDS, 25 SECONDS
FREESTYLE

STAGE #3
5 YARDS, 2 ROUNDS, 4 SECONDS
FREESTYLE
Repeat 6 times for a total of 12 rounds

STAGE #4
3 YARDS, 2 ROUNDS, 4 SECONDS
STRONG HAND ONLY
Repeat 3 times for a total of 6 rounds

STAGE #5
25 YARDS, 6 ROUNDS, 12 SECONDS
FREESTYLE

***

Total number of rounds = 48
Maximum points = 240

Start position = League shooters, gun in holster, all safety devices activated, hands naturally at side.

Start signal = Target turns and is visible.

Stop signal = Target turns and is not visible.

Sportsmen division shooters, gun in two handed firing position, some part of gun or hands touching the table.

Penalties = 5 point deduction for each extra hit (48 maximum) on the target.

A Great Gun Week…

This has definitely been a great gun week for me personally…

  • Saturday and Sunday was spent at Freedom Armory in Glen Rock taking the NRA’s “Basic Personal Protection In The Home” course.
     
  • Sunday morning before class I went to York Gun Show and bought my very first rifle. A 1945 Mosin-Nagant. (Gets me a bit more in touch with my Russian heritage.)
     
  • Wednesday I picked up a 2nd rifle. My first “new” rifle. One I’d been eyeing at a local FFL (Federal Firearm License a.k.a. “Gun Shop” for my newer listeners) for the past three months.  A Ruger Mini-14 Target…it is a beauty.
     
  • Thursday I participated in my first ever competitive shoot (also at Freedom Armory ). Did better than I expected. Learned a lot…mostly I learned that I have a LOT more to learn.
    Read More Here…
     
  • Lastly, my new “mini-cards” for advertising my blog arrived Wednesday. So I was able to pass those out Thursday night. :-)
    Read More Here…
     

***

All-in-all a GREAT gun week!

I hope to post further details on each of the above in the near future – so stay tuned!

- N.U.G.U.N.

Guns in Film (IMFDB.org)

Guns are a common feature in many films. From James Bond to the Matrix.  In most cases, Hollywood   misrepresents the use of firearms, the resulting display being quite unrealistic.

All that said, many gun owners often find themselves trying to identify a given firearm. Sometimes it’s easy, and other times we canbe left questioning.  But now we have a resource to assist us…

The Internet Movie Firearm Database
http://www.imfdb.org/

National Ammo Day – November 19th

November 19 is National Ammo Day.

It is a nationwide BUYcott of ammunition.  You buy ammunition.  100 Rounds a person (or more).

The goals of Ammo Day:

The goal of National Ammo Day is to empty the ammunition from the shelves of your local gun store, sporting goods, or hardware store and put that ammunition in the hands of law-abiding citizens.  Make your support of the Second Amendment known–by voting with your dollars!

http://www.ammoday.com/

Published in: on October 30, 2008 at 8:16 pm Comments (1)
Tags:

Ruger LCP Recall

Read the details here…

http://www.ruger.com/LCPRecall/index.html

We recently sent my wife’s LCP back because the trigger mechanism was not functioning properly. Trigger pulls would not always engage the firing mechanism. It was like I needed 1mm more pull.  Not sure if this is related to my issue. But it probably explains the delay in receiving our LCP back from Ruger.

Anyways, please spread the word…

Published in: on at 1:42 am Comments (5)
Tags: , ,

Some competitive action in York county…

Thursday, October 30th (6:30pm – 8:00pm) @Freedom Armory

Freedom Armory is going to try out a shooter’s league night. It is being run by one of their instructors who teaches several of the NRA courses.

Freedom Armory is located in Glen Rock, PA right off of I-83 (exit 8).

I don’t have all the details as I missed the orientation night due to work commitments. However, I believe it’s $20 a shoot. With an optional league fee of $25-$35 (this I believe gets awarded back to the league shooters).  I believe it’s 6 evenings of competition with your top four shoots counting toward league standing. (ie: drop the worst two or if you miss a shoot).

For more info, I’d suggest calling Freedom Armory…

http://www.freedomarmory.com

Published in: on October 29, 2008 at 6:18 pm Comments (1)
Tags: , ,

NRA Basic Pistol

Having taken the NRA’s FIRST Steps class in September. I had also scheduled myself to take the NRA’s “Basic Pistol”. By taking both, I would be enabled to answer questions regarding how the two courses compare.

The first day of “Basic Pistol” was very similar to the “FIRST Steps” course.  In fact they both utilize the same NRA training manual. Many of the topics covered were the same. In fact, some areas were covered a bit more thoroughly in the FIRST Steps class than in the Basic Pistol. I believe this was due to the fact that we’d all pretty much been thru the FIRST Steps, and therefore we did not ask quite as many in depth questions on certain topics; having already received the answers. It may have been furthered by the fact that we also had two days of class. Being less need to have everything crammed into a single day class.

All that said, we had more time on the range. And the shooting techniques that were introduced in FIRST Steps and reviewed in Basic Pistol truly began to have a pronounced affect on my shooting.  I began to see a noticeable improvement in my accuracy.  One thing that I did prefer over the prior class was the method of targets used. In the prior class, we had a targets with black center points/black tape to aim. In this course, we simply used a blank target. Firing one round and setting our groups around it.  This really jibed well with me.

The second day was new territory. In particular, we focused on one-handed shooting – both strong hand and weak hand. The course also featured a brief exam courtesy of the NRA.  I found the exam to be fairly easy. I got a couple of question wrong, but in both cases it was an internal debate in my mind as to what the question was actually seeking. There were a few other such questions which, while I got right, I believed them to be poorly worded, unclear or ambiguous in their answers.  But overall it wasn’t a bad exam.

The second day’s range time was a learning experience. I was partly surprised how decent I was doing one-handed.  I’d fired my sidearm one-handed at the range before. In fact, I have shot better strong-handed than when wielding dual-handed on a few occasions. But my few attempts at weak-handed were pretty disastorous. It does involve learning (or rather, teaching yourself) new actions.  It was very beneficial to do the entire process weak-handed. I realized that my muscles/brain had no clue where my mag release was, or the slide release.  Not to mention a friendly little reminder from my side-arm that these were new muscle actions. (I pinched my hand while sliding in a fresh magazine. I had already performed this task weak-handed a few times. But I tried to go a bit faster than my lack of muscle memory allowed for and the result was a small blood blister.  All-in-all, a very good learning experience.

Finally, we concluded the class with cleaning our firearms. And receiving guidance and recommendation on the methods to do so, the variations for different firearms, etc.  This is something I considered quite beneficial. On top of being scarce, trying to read how to clean a firearm from a website or book is rather deficient – it’s really a hands-on education.

***

So what are my thoughts regarding the comparison of FIRST Steps versus Basic Pistol?

I do feel there is a lot of similarity between the two courses. If you were to only take one course it would probably be dependent on whether you intended to utilize your firearm regularly, practice or whether you’ve simply purchased a firearm for the intent of having on hand in your home for self-defense. If the former, than Basic Pistol will give you a full entry. If the latter, than FIRST Steps may be a satisfactory option.  It is also important to note that certain states require a training course for a concealed carry permit. And some states, like Connecticut, will not accept the “FIRST Steps” course – requiring the more comprehensive “Basic Pistol” class.

Regarding taking both classes – I do not think it a waste to take both courses, especially if you are a new shooter who is serious about their education and training.  Taking both courses provides a review of the safety.  Furthermore, it includes additional range time. And I noticed a much more significant improvement in my shooting on the first day of Basic Pistol.  While I had been introduced to various techniques in FIRST Steps; it was the second day of shooting that the techniques really came together. However, as these courses are not free. I’d probably recommend the “Basic Pistol” over the FIRST Steps for most individuals.  You get all the same basics, greater range time, more advanced shooting stances (one-handed), and training on the care and maintenance of firearms.

***

Lastly, I want to state the fact that there is likely to be some variance from instructor to instructor.  And I heartily recommend taking these courses at a location that provides good quality instruction. While I could have found courses that were slightly cheaper. In fact had a quote from a nearby range, I was not comfortable with that venue’s quality.  In fact, that particular range in question was recently broken into and robbed and criticized for having woefully inadequate security. It was a confirmation of my gutt instinct that such was NOT where I wanted to learn.

Instead, I ponied up a bit more $$$ and took the courses at Freedom Armory in Glen Rock, PA with an instructor by the name of Chuck. I enjoyed Chuck’s instruction. I felt that I was learning from a competent individual with a strong experience level.  I also appreciated the fact that Chuck never came off egotistical or  condescending.  I have always preferred teacher with humility. Perhaps because my experiences have showed me that such instructors usually provide better more accurate instruction.

I imagine the quality of these classes can vary greatly based upon the instructor teaching a given course. FIRST Steps may have been more comparable under my instructor as he really wanted to make sure we all knew what he thought we should. And desired us to have a more emphasized shooting experience than what the NRA mandated as a minimum. I also agreed with his reasoning.  Under another instructor, there might be a greater difference in depth between FIRST Steps & Basic Pistol, though in all likelihood it’ll probably compare closely to my opinions above.

In closing, I hope this helps you to decide what is right for you.  I don’t think you can go wrong taking both. As long as you are prepared to accept that there will be a fair amount of redundancy and that a good 60%-70% will be review. Taking the understanding that there is benefit in such repetitiveness in the classroom, just as there is out on the range.

That said, I think many if not most should be able to get by fine only taking Basic Pistol. But I would argue that if you are intending to take shooting seriously or are planning to carry, than you really must consider these courses as the beginning of your education. (ie: Kindergarten and 1st Grade)

One last comment regarding the NRA “FIRST Steps”. It was a good class to take with my wife. I can’t really give any solid reasoning for this other than it just felt like the right amount of time and effort for a couple activity.

***

If you’ve taken any of the NRA pistol courses, I’d love to hear what your thoughts and opinions were on them. Please feel free to chime in and comment below.

It is my hope that my experiences with these courses will help to offer some explanation as to what to expect, and help you in your decision of which course is right for you.

Sincerely,
N.U.G.U.N.

*Note – I utilized a Ruger P-345 in .45 ACP for all range shooting for this course.

Published in: on October 26, 2008 at 3:35 am Comments (2)
Tags: , , , , ,

Parkour

Why is a gun blog talking about form of running? in particular “Parkour”?  Because I believe it to be highly relevant to self-defense.  Let me explain….

When a human being encounters a threat there is a “fight or flight” response. If you’ve taken any kind of formal handgun training or martial arts than you are familiar with this concept.

The use of firearms is a “fight” defense. However, this may or may not be your best course.  Deciding tactic to utilize in a given threat situation will be up to you if and when such a situation materializes. And we hope it never does.

“Parkour” is essentially the “martial art of flight”. Where as Kung-Fu, Ju-Jitsu, Karate, etc. are martial arts which focus on self-defense utilizing training and discipline to maximize an individuals’ ability.  “Parkour is a form of movement that stresses efficiency and speed. The point is to to get from spot A to spot B as quickly and efficiently as possible. Free Running is similar but it can also involve aesthetic movements such as flips, spins, and many other forms of ‘flair’ (traceurs, practitioners of parkour, usually frown upon movement “wasted” on aesthetics).” *  It was started in France (yes, I know, a multitude of jokes about “where else would the art of running away” come from).  And just like any martial art, there are people with a variety of skill levels.

EXAMPLES OF PARKOUR:

To witness Parkour at it’s peak, here are a few videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jquXcwooV6A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x98jCBnWO8w&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JO8aWZnxrA8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVQNt64PxfE

These links include some more basic elements
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LREyzofKpT4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkHPQPozDRs&feature=user

Here’s a bit more realistic version along with outtakes of failures at the end.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0T9ZBKE22Y&feature=related

And of course the sport doesn’t have to be played alone…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qhgIdP3l3I&feature=related

***

Fascinated yet?  If so, you might be asking yourself – “So how do I get started?”  I’ve found a few links. Now granted, this is something I am looking to start myself. I do not have any experience on the effectiveness of any of the suggestions. I’ve just chosen to include these links in case you choose to experiment with Parkour. Of course, with all these links, use your judgment – glean what is good and discard the bad.

“How to Get Started in Parkour or Free Running”*
http://www.wikihow.com/Get-Started-in-Parkour-or-Free-Running

“How to Become an Expert at Parkour”
http://www.wikihow.com/Become-an-Expert-at-Parkour

“Urban Freeflow”
http://www.urbanfreeflow.com/deep_end/index.htm

“How to Practice Parkour- A guide for those about to take the first step”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3112391/How-to-Practice-Parkour-A-guide-for-those-about-to-take-the-first-step

Wikipedia article describing history, philosophy, and common movements.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkour

***

Lastly, I want to state clearly for the record, that I see the value in “Parkour” as a training and discipline for the use of escape in situations of threat.  While free running, acrobatics, etc. May be fun and are most definitely eye-candy for the casual observer. I see little use in these for the stated goal.

Get from point A (area of threat) to point B (area of safety). As such, I encourage the pursuit of “Parkour” from the angle of learning and improving your own bodies abilities to overcome obstacles in your path of escape.

- N.U.G.U.N.

Published in: on October 22, 2008 at 7:06 pm Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , ,

Why do you shoot? Why do you carry, if you choose to do so?

“Why do I shoot?”

I shoot to train. In order to hone my skills so that I will be safe to myself, my family and others. And effective against any threats.

The fact that I’ve found myself enjoying the self-competitive aspect of shooting is a by-factor.

“Why do I carry?”

I carry in order to be ready and able to defend my loved ones in a diversity of situations and environments.

So now I’ll ask my readers… “Why do you shoot? Why do you carry, if you choose to do so?”

***

RobertaX created a post that essentially turned into a meme and began circulating throughout the gun blogger community. She asked her readers:

“How about you? Why do you shoot? Why do you carry, if you carry at all?”
http://twowheeledmadwoman.blogspot.com/2008/10/why-i-shoot.html

The above is my answer…

Published in: on October 21, 2008 at 6:06 pm Leave a Comment